funny the last guardian gameplay funny voice guy

#Funny the last guardian gameplay funny voice guy movie

For how long this game has been in development, game-play should be perfectly polished, with no frame rate drops, stutters, or areas where the player can be confused due to poor architecture.įor a game that has been in development for 8-9 years to have the same performance issues as a game with a 3 year dev time, and poor level design on top of it, is inexcusable in my opinion. At least SotC was epic boss fights, which would have been mundane in film.

#Funny the last guardian gameplay funny voice guy movie

So what I'm getting out of this, is that the game looks beautiful, but the gameplay itself is frustrating, somewhat unpolished, and the main feature is an AI that can blatantly ignore you?Ĭant help but feel like last guardian would have made a better movie then game if that is the case. I am pretty excited by this, even though I don't think I'll ever play this game. I am looking at Trico's behavior and AI as (hopefully) the first of a new generation of AI companions that feel realistic, even if they aren't actually realistic. I think they got pretty good at this over time. You want that pillar to obey the laws of physics as it falls, but it still has to consistently land in the right place to make a bridge, which is completely unrealistic.

This reminded me of some of the challenges I heard about on the Havoc engine vis-a-vie physics-y solutions to in-game puzzles or obstacles.Įxample: Player is supposed to use explosives to topple a pillar over a chasm, creating a bridge.

If your neighborhood still has a game-rental shop, anyway. This really does feel like a PS2-era game in many ways, and one of them is that you can just rent this instead of buying it. Trico really is charming at his best.Īnyone who was more delighted than annoyed by the companion-play of Ico owes it to themselves to try this with open eyes and a lot of forgiveness on tap. I think a lot of gamers have dreamed of a really cool 'I'm questing with a REAL LIVE pet' experience, and this is as close as I've ever seen. Having only played a couple of hours, I defer to Kyle's frustrations and annoyances, but I wonder if there was some way that the design studio could have made Kyle happy without abandoning the apparent design mission. It's better as a feeling and message game than it is about a clear game to be beaten/solved/mastered. This is mechanically a very different kind of experience than a standard adventure game, in that it's trying to communicate an emotional bond through a wild animal that is in some ways your pet and in other ways its own autonomous beast. I agree with Kyle's take-but I also think he's pointing out the critical divergence point that this game currently hinges on.